The Higher and Lower Self in Martial Arts

Many in the martial arts industry say you should always fight fire with fire. That you should be bigger, stronger and more aggressive than the opponent. “Bigger, faster, fitter, stronger”. Yes, you should become healthier, more motivated, and increase your abilities, but beyond a point it becomes counter productive. Because in fact we are not invincible or anywhere close. We should be careful not to deplete our resources by becoming embroiled in endless petty battles, particularly if they don’t serve to improve us in the long run. This is what makes us stronger, more energised, and able.

A moments reflection would tell us that spending all our time thinking about all the enemies out there, and confronting everyone, would only result in overtraining and burnout. This intelligence is the reasoning of the higher self, which is wise and knows what it’s talking about. The higher self should manage and command the more instinctual side, which can be called the lower self.

Through will power the higher self channels the lower instincts in a direction of its choosing. It is highly influential, but only if used activly, unlike the lower self which is automatic. The higher self is like a general in battle, it sees everything more clearly than the ground troops, who are ready to fight all the time and get themselves killed for what the consider glory.

Overdoing the physical side of training is a common pitfall in martial arts. It is good to train hard, particularly to correct laziness if that is a weakness. But in their quest to be strong, people do all sorts of counterproductive exercises which cause wear and tear, and general exhaustion. But then they will say “I’m losing it, I’ve got to get back to how I was and double the effort!”. In fact, this stagnation is a sign that they were overdoing it, usually in their youth, and are now paying the price for such “overspending”. Yes, what we can get away with in our youth is quite unbelievable, but this approach is disastrous later on.

Instead of promoting moderation, many trainers out there will appeal to the students lower nature by encouraging it. Often without knowing. Although, to be fair, a trainer who knows what they are doing is simply testing the student to see if they take the bait. “C’mon you’re weak”, “You call that a kick up, pathetic!”. When you hear this sort of thing, my approach is to ignore it totally. You can never be sure whether the coach thinks they are helping or not. Just go about your usual training, and if they are any good, the coach was just testing to see whether you would rise above it. This indfference is a triumph over your instincts whilst putting them to work, which is the only way of using them properly.

Wanting to be invincible, strong, and tough is often the real enemy if taken as a literal possibility. It’s great as an ideal to intelligently aim towards. I say it is the enemy because eventually this same pride which once spurred us on, later saps us of our reserves. This is our lower nature given free reign. It gets us seriously injured, and focuses our attention on overcoming ignorant individuals or unimportant tasks when we should be moving beyond such concerns. “Are you going to let him get away with that”, “Did you see that look he just gave me”, these are all tell tale signs of our instinctual lower self which we have chosen to identify with instead of order around.

If you progress and live past a certain point, it is usually because you have managed to become wiser. However, there is virtually no guidance on the subject and people think it is just the natural course of events to stagnate and decline with age. Instead, you should be healthier and more energised, having eliminated so much baggage that often the young and naïve carry about. Often as we get older, the lower self will say “You’ve lost your edge”, you’re no good anymore”. This is all perfectly normal. But instead of listening to it, put it to work and relate instead to your higher self and it’s reasoning powers1.

Rather than listening to reason, instead we often listen to our lower instincts, which tell us to be hyper vigilant all the times and look for enemies everywhere. It has a point, and should be given a seat at the policy table, but it is always belligerent and domineering if left to its own devices. It often drowns out reason, the higher self. The lower self is a relentless source of energy and motivation, an endless battery, but lacks even common sense. According to its reasoning, peace does not exist and we should live in chaos all the time. This is a reflection of our animal ancestors, who did live in constant threat of predation all the time. But if we start listening to it, we start to become like animals ourselves. In other words, we resemble that which we look at and contemplate: therefore we should see the world through the vision of higher reasoning.

Obviously we still, even today, live in threat. For example, the threat of losing our mortgage, or job. But these threats require more careful management, and aren’t worth loosing our reason over. Such concerns require the intelligent use of the lower nature by the higher self. The lower nature alerts us to action, but it shouldn’t lead the operation. It is vitally important to stimulate us to act, and to detect possible threats. This is why highly intense individuals have cat like reflexes, and are able to process thoughts and actions so quickly. But so many such individuals have failed to control and channel their emotions and have instead been destroyed by them.

The lower nature will tell us to always watch out for double crosses, liars, and thieves. It will only be satisfied if we come down to that level and buy into it totally. But in doing so, you too will become part of that category of behaviour, ignorant and counter productive. Instead, leave the lower nature to say what it likes, after all it is a workhorse and supplies us with energy and motivation. We don’t need to give it the time of day. Relate and see the world through the eyes of the higher self instead. This is the key, to use the lower nature to sense danger and support combat skills to add instinctive power and dynamism to our actions.

You don’t conquer circumstances or enemies by becoming like them and thinking about them all the time. This is what gives them power, and over time the qualities they show manifest in you too. So even if you get rid of your enemy, it is as if they live on in you taking revenge day by day. For example, if someone you work with is antagonistic towards you for no apparent reason, they will often try to drag you down to their level. But you often come to resemble them over time if you continue to lower yourself in this way. For example, you share the same mannerisms, appearance, and even personality as this is a pre requisite of relatedness.

I recommend thinking about the steps you can take to avoid confrontation at all. Think instead about positive and productive achievements you can make by ignoring people on the individual level of personal dislike, which is the viewpoint of the lower self. The lower self, if listened to will contantly want to outdo everybody and will never be happy until it has won against everything, especially higher reason. And people think this is progress!

To conquer an enemy, why not make a friend of them instead. I have done this for years, and if you do it properly you can make some of the most powerful and lasting friendships with people who would otherwise have drained your time and energy. You might say “Well I can’t be fake and like that person!” and that only a weakling wouldn’t dominate them. That is the lower self calling such actions cowardly, and weak, etc., And what is fake or weak about turning a situation to your advantage using strategy and determination? The real fakery is to think that the initial impulse to dislike is someone is an enduring trait that you should listen to and respect. This perspective was meant to be outgrown, just as we have evolved to live in houses instead of mud huts.

The real enemy is often the lower self talking as it does, because it lives in a bygone era and goes on like a broken record. It’s the general who fights the last war over and over again. But the instincts are not the real you, even if we have chosen to identify with them. This is a big problem in Martial arts, as elsewhere, because it greatly limits any progress to a very low level.

The instincts are particularly stimulated by high intensity training, and they are highly prevalent in emergency situations, such as self defence. They flatter us with how great we are at responding to such situations. “What a Hero!” it says. As soon as you hear this kind of thing throw it away immediately, it becomes a burden and a waste of time to think like this for long. It may puff you up for a bit, but it simply gets in the way of clear thinking afterwards. This is true humility.

When facing off against an opponent, the lower self tells us all sorts of overblown things like, “they’ve got nothing on me”, or “I’ll crush that pathetic idiot”. And this is what gives us the overconfidence, delusions even, to act. But it is a mistake to identify with the delusions of the lower self at any other time than to save your skin. It works for you, and cannot work but through you. Whilst it can be thanked for saving our life, the lower self cannot be trusted to make wise decisions because they will simply get us into trouble until we find it everywhere, in our friends, colleagues, and relatives for instance. It must be used, as it often motivates us, and at any rate it can’t be switched off without dire consequences. Instead, we must channel the motivation to in a direction of our choosing, rather than being dictated to by it.

Most of the training out there centres around building confidence to the degree that when someone gets a blackbelt, or wins a few matches, they think they should become a hero. Often, they feel that if they don’t do this, their training was a waste of time. They should have become a superman. In their eyes, it’s now time to prove how tough they are. Examples of this on social media are endless. Again, this is the lower instinctual self talking. It is very convincing and seductive, unless great effort is made by the higher self to silence it. When the higher self asserts its reasoning, you often realise that what you were after all that time is not what you want anymore. This is the often the case with martial arts and “winning at all costs.”

Many people go around showing off how tough they are having learnt some secret moves, but then end up having to give up training altogether through disillusionment and lethargy. This is by no means the natural course of events. Personally, I am not at all bothered about combat effectiveness or becoming the greatest athlete anymore. I recommend following simple exercises, repeating them for years regularly, and through your love of a high ideal to overcome weakness, remain effective, and become wiser, you will make progress better than if you were to take short cuts and buy into delusions.

How many experts out there preach humility, and how you should stay out of trouble, and yet recount with excitement their stories about how they once did this or that to such and such a person. I’ve sat and listened to many of these stories. This is the lower self once again bragging and loudly proclaiming how great it is, in its attempts to undermine those around it. It’s instinctively calculating, and is looking for the lower self in others to be wowed by it. I’ve seen this countless times in martial arts and elsewhere. Often when you look at these individuals, it is obvious they could no longer even run up a flight of stairs. This egocentric behaviour, which is a form of living in the past is something that often afflicts experts who are no longer progressing or evolving.

References

See Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov The Key to the Problems of Existence. in this Book, Aivanhov describes the difference between the higher and lower self, and how to change perspective. In other words, how to relate to the higher self and not be fooled by the tricks of the lower self. I have adapted lot of the ideas from here, as they are highly relevant.

Instincts, Behaviour and Archetypes.

“…instincts are not vague and indefinite by nature, but are specifically formed motive forces which, long before there is any consciousness, and in spite of any degree of consciousness later on, pursue their inherent goals. Consequently they form very close analogies to the archetypes, so close, in fact, that there is good reason for supposing that the archetypes are the unconscious images of the instincts themselves, in other words, that they are patterns of instinctual behaviour.”

Carl Jung

The purpose of this little piece is to discuss what drives, behaviors, and archetypes are and how they interact to produce powerful results. I start by discussing instincts, and then talk about how they drive behaviour and form purposeful actions. From there I discuss how “archetypal” images, in the psyche, represent these various actions in the minds eye. With unity of these processes, you can understand how to get better results in practice. Because these processes underpin everything else. The basic idea is to build whatever you want on top of these fundamentals forms, which are according to some basic laws of nature.

I

The instincts, or “motive forces” are what drive us towards goals. These goals, or outcomes, are achieved by various instinctual movement patterns which form behaviour. Of course, such behaviours come in many forms, and can serve purposes many purposes, often seemingly unrelated to the driving force. But the underlying foundations are universal. For example, babies are born wanting to grab things. From this innate tendency comes grabbing a hammer, and then from a combination of other patterns the adult learns to become a carpenter. The baby was not born with knowledge of carpentry, he acquired and created it with his own internal apparatus. It was just a question of combining what was already there and expressing it creatively. However, for carpentry to have developed it must have corresponded to some ancient wisdom within us.

Learning to do things does not always run smoothly, particularly if the foundation upon which the structure is built is at fault. Steve Morris says:

“Standing, running, climbing, pushing, pulling, swinging, catching, throwing…you know.  All those things kids do!  Those are the fundamentals.  And beneath these, in order to facilitate a dynamic equilibrium of change, are the reflex patterns which allow you to work at an instinctive level.  We’ve inherited them from our animal ancestors.  You don’t have to think about how to maintain this equilibrium of change; the body is reflexively designed to do that for you.  Indeed, any attempt to interfere with this process by motor oriented response, negates it.  That’s why you end up with robotic movement patterns.”1

It is clear from this that any movement pattern, such as in martial arts, should build upon fundamentally sound basis. You can’t have a fantasy move and expect it to work optimally. By all means be creative, but make sure it corresponds to natural laws, or don’t – and then run the risk of never connecting the dots.

How do we know when what we are seeing is a good model to practice? One way to answer this question is: If on some instinctive level what we are seeing is worthwhile, then its impression resonates within us intuitively, grabbing our attention. At the same time, if when we ourselves actually then perform those same actions we observed, and this has the same meaningful impression within us, then this strongly indicates we are on the right tracks. It’s about intuitive sense, rather than appearances. This does not suppose we are viewing such examples of practice as “perfect” form. Whatever we are doing must remain flexible, which is why our instincts are so vague. We are supposed to create and change, according to certain principles, or laws if you like. It’s all a process of evolution and constant adaption.

On his Facebook page, Steve Morris has talked about how “mirror neurons” can allow you to learn from others (by mimicking them), spot a fraudulant claim, or tell what an attacker might want to do. This is done by reading the individual and empathising with such people. Of course this is a developed capability, but it is built on innate sytems. We seem to have within us a sense for deception as well as truth, and a corresponding mental model representative of these and many other things.

Jung says that an archetype is “a hypothetical and irrepresentable model, something like the pattern of behaviour in biology”.2 This implies that there is a potential within the subconscious, or the instinctual side of the individual, to create a mental representation of a physical action. That is, based on a set of fundamental laws. This potential stems from an intuitive internal understanding of various actions, or an “archetypal” model – which is inborn. This archetype is perhaps what mirror neurons refer towards for validation. Importantly, there are so many of these models it is hardly worth trying to make a system out of them. You’d just get lost in the details. we’re better off looking at them as concepts. In any case, archetypal forms are so varied and adapted to different designs within individuals, each with different experiences and environments, that the only real question is: what are their universal basic forms?

A physic archetype corresponds to the physical action upon which it is based. These two elements are part of a whole. A richer understanding of the dynamic interaction between physical actions, archetypes, and instincts can give a clearer and more effective vision of the physical action itself being played out in the minds eye. Or practice of an action can enrich the mental archetype, which can then influence the physical. There is a circular relationship between knowledge and action. They both inform each other. Importantly, mental representations can be developed and built upon in the same way as their physical counterparts. And, whilst the developments of such mental actions do not take the place of instincts (which are better expressed as fixed laws), these actions instead become second nature. This is important because whilst the instincts remain fixed and stable like roots, the possibility for expression of them can reach great heights from such a solid dependable base. You can’t have one without the other.

An action being performed is pretty meaningless without a archetypal performer. We need a person doing these in the psychic realm as well as the physical. We need to personify the thoughts about our instincts, behaviours, and motives. And we have the basic foundations, and it is up to us to create and fashion optimal products according to our motive drives. Our raw materials. But there are rules. Jung also says:

“The spontaneous manifestation of the unconscious and its archetypes intrudes everywhere into his conscious mind, and the mythical world of his ancestors—for instance, the aljira or bugari of the Australian aborigines—is a reality equal if not superior to the material world.

It is not the world as we know it that speaks out of his unconscious, but the unknown world of the psyche, of which we know that it mirrors out empirical world only in part, and that, for the other part, it moulds this empirical world in accordance with its own psychic assumptions.”

From this it could be concluded that mirror neurons see through the unconscious mind, and look for a corresponding physical equivalent. They seek to define what they see rather than being defined by outside influence. For example, if we see a fighter who is using fundamental movement patterns well, this will resonate within our unconscious. That is, the instinctive side of us. It will therefore to some extent at least be a true form. Furthermore, if the action is performed vigorously with aggressive intent then all the better, because the interaction of instinctive behaviour, and driving forces, will make a greater, or truer impression on us. This develops a mental model which influences and builds upon our archetypal form. This archetype then manifests itself physically by giving form to our our physical actions This process can evolve as our understanding and experience dictates. This obviously does not happen overnight but with practice over time. It is about combing many different materials and forms in endless ways, like an architect.

Importantly, our archetypal image should have outstanding personal qualities as well as physical ones. Otherwise how can we identify with it? It needs character like ourselves. And who wants to be an individual with no good qualities?

There is within us an ideal man or woman, which can be developed consciously using the instinctive drives and behaviours to achieve some ideal. In other words, our instinctive tendencies can be instructed by our conscious influence to be expressed through thoughts and behaviour on the physical. This is done all the time with our every thought. It is a question of directing our thoughts towards some high, and necessarily unachievable ideal with will power. This too is an instinctive tendency, however it often goes unrealised.

If left to themselves our thoughts tend towards chaos or mediocrity. This is the purpose of conscious will, to enslave the raw materials of ourselves, as other laws of nature do with their own materials. Take the example of gravity, it imposes it’s will on matter. This is it’s purpose, according to nature. As for us, the more meaningful and respectable the ideal, according to fundamental laws, and principles, the more powerful the results. Make it your mission, as nature intended, to use the conscious mind you’ve been equipped with to control the raw materials you have uncovered. Why else are we conscious?

“

References

1 See Steve Morris Letters: About Fundamentals.

2 See C.G Jung The Archetypes and the collective unconscious.

Back to top ⇧