If you are hungry, you seek. If you are satisfied, you no longer seek. So remaining hungry is not in terms of winning a match here and there, or some other magnified glory which mimics day to day ordinary experience. It is to do with staying hungry for self expansion, which is the real urge. This can never be satisfied, it is just a question of ever expanding horizons. This is known as innovation, which can’t happen unless there is openness and space to become active.
Maintaining this awareness, there there is never an end point, is a tool in the arsenal of the fighter. Planned outcomes are limited. There is nothing wrong with pre planned strategies, it’s just they aren’t for everyone, but they are prescribed to all increasingly. They are important for professional contests which have to have a certain feel to them. It is entertainment and business. The crowd expects to see it play out in a certain way. There are institutional requirements. You’re paid to win in a specific organised way.
You can’t be crammed with conclusions and still remain open. So for the competitive athletes, there are certain conclusions to be drawn in advance about what to do rather than spontaneously deciding. At the same time, there are methods that top level athletes use to maintain a constant state of awareness as to what they need to do. When you pay attention to the organised chaos around you, which is the nature of the universe, you will not lose focus. In any event, what you are focusing on in terms of technical training is a reflection of the inner experience. The boundary line is so thin, but definite. Say for example you are in a martial arts match. The experience going on between you is very similar, it’s just that there is an outside experience and an inside contained experience. The key is to learn how to define the experience is terms of the whole thing, rather than just what you have accumulated in terms of impressions and technical expertise. This is known as letting go of assumptions. You don’t need to worry about forgetting, just pay absolute attention, the organism knows what to do.
How can you think more holistically, rather than just on technical details? There are some simple methods. In martial arts, if you train moving backwards rather than forwards, you are able to spontaneously know what to do because you maintain a space and awareness, including what your opponent is doing as they come forwards. This means you are adjusting all the time, rather than just because you want to or not. This may be confusing at first, because it is a new way of doing things. It’s not to be confused with evasion and escaping the contest. This is a positive strategy to maintain your awareness on you forward momentum whilst at the same time pulling back so they you keep that equal and opposite force to maintain equilibrium. This will bring inner balance.
In Muay Thai your strategy is to break down the opponent over several rounds, not avoid such a contest. So here, in Muay Thai, they are known to be able to fight moving backwards as well as forwards. This does not mean they are evasive, it simply means that they are active if the opponent rushes them, or they maintain their balance even if they miss the opponent whilst swinging at them.
The Creative Process
In modern martial arts training these days, it is more and more about practicing what you are going to do before hand, rather than remaining creative and spontaneous. This is a negative strategy which does not empower the fighter to systematically break down the opponent. If they thought only about doing this as a process, moving around in such a way as to remain constantly aware of their mission, this would empower them greatly. This takes time, and this is also what can’t be coached. However, it can be imbibed and transmitted through the right atmosphere quite easily over time.
Having an excess of rules and regulations simply makes it hard to understand what one is actually doing. when a culture has no room for diversity of individual flair, where no one has their own rhythms, then what you are left with is uniformity and stagnation. So the rules make it difficult to become creative, even if that creatively is supposed to be the goal. For example, as a fighter are you there to push yourself, or maintain a steady result? Many people want the experience of martial arts, not the so called results of winning a contest. Martial arts is what you can do, or it is what you can become. These are questions to ask sincerely. This is not at all clear in peoples minds, so what you often get a situation where you have people become disillusioned or get crushed by pressures they did not consider.
So the reason for centralised or regulated sport is not to control people or simply to use them as a commodity for the industry. This only leads to limited aspiration. Centralised control originally meant not for profit, either for glory or for funding. Martial arts has always been about aspiring for more than just fulfilling institutional requirements. The institution should provide some simple structure and organisation.
In the past, the knowledge was kept separate across the land or according to different disciplines, even within the same population. It was necessary to develop new ways of doing things by travelling from temple to temple, and from discipline for discipline. This was not centralised but there were people who could direct you. This was when there was a culture of seeking, rather than having everything under one roof. At the same time this united people across the land, because you had the opportunity to perform a different discipline which required a commitment and travel to that particular culture within a culture. For example, even in the West, American wrestling requires you to commit to that discipline, which later gave many mixed martial arts fighters an unbeatable foundation. It is then a case of add bits on to the foundation, rather than having a foundation that changes according to the latest popular trends. There are many kinds of Chinese martial arts across China, each insisting on similar commitments in their own ways. this is not really to suppress the martial artists, but simply because most people won’t make it by chopping and changing disciplines constantly.
Minimising Loopholes
In Mixed martial arts (MMA) which is one of the more realistic style of martial arts in many ways, you can avoid the fight by exploiting the rules in some way. There are all sorts of loopholes. This has mainly come about because people no longer see why they are keeping for any meaning other than winning. For example, you can avoid a contest by simply appearing active without doing as much as somebody else. Nobody would do this is the spirit of martial arts and the competence levels were fully on. Entire strategies have developed in terms of looking active to get points, but not doing much in terms of real activity. In an atmosphere of open honesty, if you were to ask people about this who are involved in martial arts, I would say that ninety percent of them would say that this is normal and they would also consider do this. There’s nothing wrong with any of this really, but let’s not dress it up as something it isn’t. In my opinion, to allow people to flourish in competition, what we need are simple rules and minimum loopholes, so that what has been practiced can be transmitted to the arena itself, rather than someones individual expectations.
What are these loopholes? In MMA they are not allowed to hit each other in the back of the head, so all you do is present the back of your head as a target to the opponent to shield your own face, which they would otherwise hit. This strategy has given many athletes the edge in key situations. Because you turn the head away from them in certain situations, they are forced to attack only that. Now if they hit you, they get penalised, not you. If you do this in a fight, you’re dead meat.
In Taekwondo, a style which I used to practice originally, it pays off in terms of points to fall down after kicking, pretending that you slipped so the opponent can’t get you back with a counter strike. This would not happen if your strategy was to break down the opponent and win by superior strategy. For example, if your attack was aimed at kicking the opponent and then landing in such a position that you were strong, there would be no need to fall down because you would exploit your own strength and superior positioning. This is why the greatest fighters have often been those who can fight moving backwards rather than stalling. Fighting is about superior will, and when the opponents will is lost, only then can it be called a true victory. This may sound brutal, but this is the reason for the harsh training conditions of the past, so that even if you failed, you failed spectacularly and won at life. If there is anything left, then the only way you can be defeated is if you give up. If none of this happens then you haven’t lost anything, just a petty scoreboard result at most. This is the law of the jungle, if you know how to live you will find a way, even if you are beaten down.
Winning the Match, Not the Result
The original aim of MMA in the West was to see which style was the best and most effective. This is what Art Davey, the original Founder of the UFC said in his book. Obviously MMA existed elsewhere, such as Vale Tudor competitions in Brazil. Some of these early matches, which can easily be found on Youtube, involved the competitors fighting in a mixed style and then backing off to give each other a break if for some reason the opponent got a cut or something. The fight would then continue promptly. They didn’t do this very often but it happened. I’m only mentioning this because these examples show how the culture has changed from upholding the contest to winning it for yourself. Letting the opponent back up may be seen as an act of weakness to finish the fight by many, however, these were the best competitors around at the time. And if an opponent is broken down, it doesn’t matter much if you allow them the courtesy of checking with a doctor if they can continue.
When you consider that the goal was not just to win but to win properly in a fair match, it immediately becomes obvious that although there were no rules as such there was an agreement of practice that the contest must be allowed to be true.
In previous generations of mixed fighting, there were no rules as such but there were points to follow, such as a fighters code. This may seem like a worthless agreement, but when there are no rules, trained referees, vast sums of money, or security, then the procedural knowledge of conduct is paramount. Otherwise you have a war on your hands when the different teams of trained martial artists feel cheated. There is simply no standing in such a community if you are seen as a cheat. When I say community, I don’t mean an organised governing body or anything like that. That is a governed community, not an organised chaos. What I’m talking about is an organised chaos between rivalled groups, which understood the dynamics were such that you couldn’t go round asserting yourself without paying certain consequences. This is life, which can lead to unecessary war if you’re careless about such matters.
Mixed Approaches to Martial Arts
There are various rules sets all with their own backgrounds and cultures within them. For example, in and around China, there are hundreds of styles of martial arts. It’s not like there is one system which created all the others. Each of them believe themselves to be authentic. When you consider that each group is free to develop themselves uniquely, this becomes a real possibility for all. I used to travel to Taiwan from time to time and I discovered that they had a self defence system which involved joint locks and other self defence practices. This did not look like a Chinese system as we are familiar with. Lots of people suppose all they re doing in Kung Fu or Tai Chi out in the far East. However, what I also found out was that the systems of self defence had evolved in the context of police training, rather than mixed martial arts competition. So these weren’t taught to everyone. Everyone needs a different approach. This makes sense when you thing of whether things are relevant or not to certain people, rather than getting the same system out to everybody.
Mixed Martial Arts is nothing new, the idea that it is prescribed as a sport or to everybody in a systematic way is the new idea. Not every has the capacity or cultural set up to endure such emphasis on brutality. This is why many of the MMA fighters who have retired have taken to violence or drugs outside of their careers. If you engage in violence without the right social structure, then it is very possible that the intensity of the situation will destroy you. I’ve seen this myself many times. So it is not because of the lack of knowledge that these things were reserved for only certain segments of society in the past, but because they didn’t want a culture of barbarians. In my experience, martial arts is such a powerful tool for transformation, and as such you can easily open yourself up to severely negative experiences if you don’t take precautions. This must have been why it was banned in many Countries following certain wars.
A very widely skilled martial artist will have to break hundreds of rules to reach the potential in what they are doing. That is if they confine themselves. However, just because you might be practicing Taekwondo, Shaolin styles, or any other type of martial art, does not mean you are confined to them. So what needs to be understood is that very specific practices, such as sports practices, aren’t the answer for everything. For instance, in Taiwan they were practicing Taekwondo and Tai Chi in various forms. That was for competition, and for health. As I was saying, the practical stuff was mainly taught to the police and authorities. So it’s not that they were unfamiliar with anything to do with what people call mixed martial arts, it’s just they that didn’t use it for competition so widely. Since nobody is attacking each other much out there, there seems to be no point investing so much into it when economic growth requires much more attention than survival necessities.
Say for example you are defending the border of your country. You won’t actually fight that often unless it’s an emergency because you have to be diplomatic, find ways around conflict, and plan in advance how to do all this. It is the same in martial arts. In a Country like Taiwan, there is virtually no crime. At the same time, there is a constant looming threat of potential invasion one from neighbouring Countries. Nobody attacks each other in the street, however the authorities themselves must be highly trained and have a certain martial attitude with practical value. So the only difference is that their practical styles of martial arts are mainly taught to the police and similar authorities, rather than the man on the street.
